Should Servants of God Vote in the Elections of Satanic Governments?

As the 2024 US election fiasco comes to an end, there are many points of reflection, particularly for Muslims who reside in the West but also for anyone who strives to be a servant of God and seeks to repudiate the devil, especially the worldly tyrants who are in service to him.

This election year was notable for many reasons, from the increased anti-voting sentiment to the rising popularity of third party candidates. These trends brought many topics of discussion to the forefront of the American Muslim community including the permissibility of voting within a system of Taghut (illegitimate, arrogant powers) to what exactly it means to be political amidst a system led by the enemies of Islam. 

Is being political solely limited to the so-called “obligation” of turning in a vote once every 2-4 years, in favor of various individuals who openly stand against Islam, let alone against the interests of the American people? Or have we limited the scope of our political roles amid such a system? Is voting for a third party candidate still an endorsement of the satanic US imperialist capitalist system? 

The rise in popularity of third party candidates rose to the forefront during the course of this year’s election. Jill Stein, the Green Party Candidate, alongside RFK Jr, an Independent Candidate and son/nephew of the two assassinated Kennedys who were known for their respectable positions and behind-the-scenes opposition to the Zionist lobby and CIA, were amongst the popular third party choices for many who have become increasingly frustrated with the two party system. While the growing anger against the system causing individuals to turn towards third parties is significant to note, the true colors of all such candidates show that there isn’t much of a difference between them and the two party candidates. 

Many were quick to label Jill Stein as “pro-Palestinian” based on some of her statements that appeared sympathetic towards Palestinians. However, her true stances became clear based on her declarations on committing to the existence and security of “Israel.” 

On multiple occasions she stated that her problem is with the current administration of the Zionist entity and not with the illegitimate occupation’s very existence. She also explained her stance on supporting Palestinians would “help ‘Israel’ be safer.” In actuality, Stein never supported the resistance’s right to fight illegal genocidal occupation, and limited the scope of the occupation to “humanitarian violations.” She has condemned Al Aqsa Flood as a “terrorist” attack and has often interacted with Code Pink, an organization which indirectly receives Soros money via the Tides Foundation, has called the Palestinian resistance “terrorists,” and endorsed the 2022 foreign-backed riots in Iran. Her stance is very much a “Liberal Zionist” approach, one that restricts the main issue of illegal occupation to simply “Netanyahu being the problem,” only certain settlements in the West Bank being the issue, or reducing the crimes of “Israel” down to apartheid and not wanting to bring an end to the illegitimate entity entirely.

Even in regards to her seemingly positive positions, they come with a litany of conditions which showcase a Liberal Zionist position. For example, her support for ending aid to “israel” was conditional, as she proposed solely to temporarily suspend such aid until the Zionist regime enacts a certain amount of policy changes.

Naturally, a politician seeking to be viable in American electoral politics cannot publicly state that they are against the existence of “israel,” but she is not doing this out of pragmatism and electability, but rather sincere belief in the Liberal Zionist point of view. Wanting to end the genocide, apartheid, or other things which are mere symptoms of the larger problem, which is the existence of the Zionist occupation entity in its entirety.

Stein even went so far as to slander former US congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, a co-author on Basira Press’ debut book in the chapter about the martyrdom of Malcolm X’s grandson, as an “antisemite” for openly pointing out the facts of “israeli” Mossad agents being arrested on the day of 9/11 in connection with the attacks. This was only discovered in a leaked secret audio recording of Stein, whose tone was very condescending, conniving, and manipulative. That she seeks to police the speech of an African American woman only validates what Malcolm X had to say about the paternalistic role that white/Jewish liberals take within various movements.

“Part of the Green Party and this whole third party nonsense is really about integrating into the system and trying to ‘reform’ a system that has blood and genocide at the foundation. If you look at the foundation of a tree, if its roots are corrupt and rotten, the whole tree is going to be rotten. The United States of America will always be rotten and will always produce what it continues to produce. Thinking that the Green Party can change things is a lot of political theater,” Abbas Muntaqim, political analyst and New Afrikan activist said in an interview with TMJ News.

A true seeker of justice doesn’t accept such a stance for it is still rooted in falsehood and benefits the occupation and the enemies. The main issue is the illegal genocidal occupation and the only form of justice is the complete termination of the Zionist Entity. Pointing out “humanitarian violations” and failing to clearly identify the enemy through statements that mix truth and falsehood only confuse the masses more.

RFK Jr. also fits into a similar pattern. While many supported him due to his solid track record of standing against Big Pharma and the unhealthy American diet, while having hopes that he would  continue the legacy of his father and uncle, those hopes quickly dissipated once his presidential campaign platform came out. In foreign policy, his campaign page advocated for all countries of the world to demilitarize and for the world to be run by a creepy global police force. While RFK extols himself as someone who opposes globalism, this plan is more in-line with the long term vision of the UN 2030 agenda. On Russia, he advocated for UN Peacekeepers to occupy the Donbass region. 

RFK has also outed himself as being more rabidly pro-Zionist than the neoconservatives he claims to oppose, going out of his way to ally with Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, known for his embarrassing behavior such as calling everyone and everything “antisemites,” including God Himself. RFK justified attacks on the West Bank by calling Jenin a “bomb factory.”

His position on Iran has been based in Islamophobia and other neocon-like positions which intentionally lie about the beliefs of Shi’a Muslims in order to foment tensions and bring Iran back under the control of the liberal world order.

Aside from fomenting war against Iran (albeit perhaps more soft war tactics, and less hard war tactics), by slandering Shi’a Islam, he deprives the American people from benefiting from the beauty of this religion. As Malcolm X once stated, Islam can solve the race problem in America. People don’t even have to become Muslim, but the wisdom of our teachings can erase the Satanic arrogance of racism from the minds of those who at least on the surface claim to believe in God. In today’s time, Islam can solve much more than just the race problem in the US, so in that sense, RFK oppresses the souls of his own people by depriving them of the truth which could lead to their salvation and greater quality of life in both the material and spiritual realms.

His own personal life is questionable, because as Muslims who are from the school of Ashura and the Islamic Revolution we are blessed to have leaders who have clean personal lives and practice what they preach. RFK’s first wife committed suicide after she found out that he cheated on her with over 30 different women. RFK also flew on the plane of notorious child sex trafficking Mossad agent Jeffrey Epstein, although RFK claims the flight was domestic within the US and not to the infamous Epstein island, thus he claims did not engage in any criminal sexual acts with minors. RFK’s second wife, Cheryl Hines, was a co-star on the infamous racist and Zionist satirical comedy show Curb Your Enthusiasm starring the Jewish-Zionist Larry David of Seinfeld fame. Curb Your Enthusiasm had several racist depictions of Palestinians; included a scene where David urinated on a photo of Jesus Christ; and featured negative portrayals of the Islamic Republic of Iran. It is hard not to connect the dots between RFK’s compromised personal life and his corrupt politics.

If RFK wasn’t immoral in his personal life and wasn’t more of a neocon Zionist than neocon Zionists, he would actually be quite a decent public health advocate and could indeed contribute a large part of what is needed to make America and the world healthy again. However, his personal life’s corruption and his detestable foreign policy positions destroy any good he has done in the sector of public health and protecting the health of children. This was proven in a recent photo op with president-elect Trump, Elon Musk, and Don Jr. all eating toxic, unhealthy McDonald’s meals aboard a plane.

Unfortunately, many American Muslim voters fell for their so-called words of support to various issues that are important, from Palestine to public health. While American Muslims’ frustration towards the current system is understandable, it’s imperative to clearly evaluate stances before making the decision to support a candidate. To add on, one must understand the Islamic perspective in participating in a system rooted in falsehood. 

The failure to recognize that one’s political duty Islamically in the United States is beyond participating in a failed satanic “democracy” and is amongst the reasons that many American Muslims went towards voting for third party candidates like Jill Stein or RFK. 

However, choosing to not participate in such a failed system, by not voting at all, is a political move in itself. Low voter turnout not only shows that one refuses to endorse a system inherently rooted in falsehood, but is also indicative of a failing democracy. 

While there was certainly an increase in anti-voting sentiment this election, too many still fell for the false notion that being political must entail in voting. This false notion also stems from failing to study and following the true role models, not liberal Muslim “leaders” but rather the truest of role models, our martyrs such as Martyr Malcolm X. 

Shaheed Malcolm X himself was vocal in his decision to not participate in this political system, particularly noting the role of the liberals in trying to gather the votes of minority groups through the use of sly and cunning language.

During the Goldwater versus Johnson election, Shaheed Malcom X stated, “I didn’t feel that Goldwater was any better for black men than Johnson, or vice-versa. I wasn’t in the United States at election time, but if I had been, I wouldn’t have put myself in the position of voting for either candidate for the Presidency, or of recommending to any black man to do so. It has turned out that it’s Johnson in the White House-and black votes were a major factor in his winning as decisively as he wanted to. If it had been Goldwater, all I am saying is that the black people would at least have known they were dealing with an honestly growling wolf, rather than a fox who could have them half-digested before they even knew what was happening”  Shaheed Malcolm X also warned to particularly look out for the “tricky fox,” referring to the liberals. While Goldwater was the “growling wolf that would keep him alert,” Johnson was the “fox who would fool.” 

Ultimately, such a discussion on third party candidates and proving the legitimacy of refraining from voting stems from limiting the scope of the problem. The problem doesn’t stem from a particular candidate or even a political party. The Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Imam Khamenei, states, “Neither of the two parties in the US has an advantage over the other in terms of moral authority. Neither the party whose government is in power in the US today nor the rival party that ran the previous government has moral authority because both parties are guilty of committing various crimes.” 

The problem is with the system as a whole, a Taghuti system, inherently rooted in falsehood and tyranny. This failure of recognizing the enemy as being the US imperialist capitalist institution as a whole has led to a lack of actively building a threatening confrontation within the system, as it is an enemy to its own people as much as it is to the rest of the world.

Imam Khamenei in Reclaiming the Narrative explains how the system of Taghut wishes to gain control over those who submit to it. “Their primary goal is securing their own individual interests, so they will use you for their own ends. If you submit to the wilayah of taghut, then all of your energy, your creativity, and your potential will fall into the grasp of the taghut and when this happens this will not be to your benefit, because Satan and taghut do not even consider what is beneficial to you. On the other hand, if they have to sacrifice you for their own ends, they will sacrifice you without hesitation. If they have to lead you astray, they will lead you astray. If they deem it necessary that you should suffer for their sake, then you must suffer for their sake.” 

The system doesn’t consider anything beneficial for the Muslims, nor the masses of American people in general, and in fact will use Muslim endorsements for their own sake. Is the very legacy of US imperialism not enough proof? How about the words of Shaheed Malcolm X when it comes to the “cunning words of the Liberal?” The very system is the problem and such a failure to recognize this hinders our communities from the real work that serves God, not the Taghut. 

Imam Khamenei also explains that the Imams (as) of Ahlul Bayt (as) and their true followers had to work within the system of Taghut and dismantle it from within. However, the Imams selected those who were both qualified for the position and who sincerely knew that they were working within an evil system that was an enemy of God and humanity. This is not from endorsing those who upheld tyranny but rather standing firmly “against the direction of the current” fearlessly and strategically. This differs greatly from empire-normalizing politicians like Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and others who get in and then become servants for the same wicked agenda. They do not understand who the enemy is and thus they perpetuate its arrogant policies. A Christian, European-descent politician like Thomas Massie has a better track record than Ilhan Omar, as the former voted against the law which sought to criminalize “antisemitic” speech in the US, while the latter voted for the proposed law.

The scholars also play a pivotal role in leading the mass towards understanding and upholding their Islamic political duty within such a system. This includes connecting the masses to the lives of our Imams (as), all of which led revolutionary political movements amid the tyrannical Ummayad and Abbasid dynasties. Releasing ambiguous statements with no clear indication on what one’s role is in living in a taghuti system, particularly during election times, serves no purpose other than causing confusion. 

There are many other methods of affecting positive change in society without participating in federal elections and thus validating the Satanic system.

While this may or may not be permissible within the Islamic framework, local elections may be the only electoral arena which can be pursued, as the 9th and 10th amendments of the US Constitution, which allow states and localities to refuse to abide by federal laws, give candidates a framework to resist the federal government in Washington D.C. on a litany of issues, from the PATRIOT Act to boycotts of “israel” to laws that criminalize “antisemitic” speech to challenging the usury-based Federal Reserve banking system to opposing the LGBT agenda and more. There are a handful of cities in the US which are considered “dry towns,” meaning alcohol is illegal, despite the fact that the US constitution forbids alcohol bans following the overturning of alcohol prohibition in the US.

While it is impermissible for Muslims to impose Islamic law in non-Muslim countries, we can advocate for policies which are based on shared principles that we have in common with the Christian community. After all, alcohol, usury, and other such things are destructive to all human beings and human society, regardless of religion. Curbing them is for the benefit of all humanity and would not constitute as imposing Islamic law on a non-Muslim country.

However, this could also be considered problematic because the permission to be able to resist against the US federal government by local and state governments comes from the federal constitution itself via the Bill of Rights, meaning that it still falls under the authority of the Satanic system.

Muslims do not constitute a formidable political bloc due to their lack of power within the system. Muslim voters have primarily relied on identity politics and cheap photo ops for earning votes, yet the politicians who do so never meet the needs of those whom they tricked for the sake of a vote. That is because Muslims in the west possess little power of their own.

Most often, Muslims in the west are immigrants whose very existence was rubber stamped by the system because the system expects a favor in return, the only exception being refugees created by wars caused by the Zionists and NATO.

Specifically, the CIA’s “brain drain” program seeks to bring the best and brightest minds from the countries they subjugated, suffocated with economic sanctions, and destroyed with wars and coups and use them to build up the US’ power and prestige. H1B visas are given so that a bright mind perfects their expertise, after which they are expected to work for a major American corporation, such as Google, Monsanto, Pfizer, or the military industrial complex. Unlike refugees who have no choice but to leave their homelands and thus deserve our sympathy, participants in the brain drain scheme emigrate willingly, and since immigration is expensive, many of them come from the upper classes of the countries they came from, but sought even greater access to wealth and riches in the west, but at the cost of their soul for helping to build up the power and prestige of Satanic systems for a paltry gain.

Many Muslims in the West live as cogs in the machine. Only a small percentage own their own firms and enterprises, and even fewer have Islamic credit unions (a type of bank) in their own localities, which would give them economic power and then in turn increase their political power. Culturally, working for major corporations is seen as a bragging right and status symbol for showing off in the local mosque, while creating a semi-autonomous socio-economic infrastructure is rarely ever encouraged. This is contrary to the activism of Malcolm X, who followed in the footsteps of his Garveyite father by encouraging socio-economic semi-autonomy among African American communities in the US.

Family and community are also a crucial part of creating a strong bloc in the US. Starting families creates a sense of selflessness and discipline for the husband and the wife, gives them a chance to provide the world with righteous children to offset the amount of corrupted children, and many other benefits. Combining many families together makes for a community, but sadly most Muslims are scattered and their choice of where to live is based off of their job and money, and not off of where is best to serve Allah, and how can I live closer to other Muslims, while avoiding becoming ghettoized. Chinese, Italians, and even homosexuals have entire neighborhoods of many major cities for themselves, and yet are still not ghettoized or fully isolated. 

Muslims don’t have to live in isolated ghettos, but they can at least live in closer distance from each other than the current status quo of being spread out, with the exception of Dearborn, Michigan. With the promotion of family values and the rejection of the anti-family agenda which wants people to get married late and have few (if any) children, this also helps to strengthen the base of any movement which seeks to stand for godly values (which both Christians and Muslims can agree on) within a Satanic system by increasing the population size of this bloc.

Having a goal in mind as well as understanding the nature of the US system is also important, because we need to know what we are fighting against. The US has never been a Christian nation, as the founding fathers were all believers in liberal “enlightenment” philosophies. John Locke, Thomas Paine, George Washington, and others loathed the church, which is why they sought separation of church and state. They were liberals motivated by liberalism, not Christians motivated by the divine values of Jesus Christ. 

Therefore, the very foundation of America is Satanic and in rebellion against God. This is something that even Christians can and should recognize, rather than living in a paradox where they don’t know the boundary between liberalism and Christianity, which are polar opposites, as the former advocates submission to the ego and enslavement to sin while the latter advocates submission to God and being free from lowly temptations.

Therefore, as long as the structure created by George Washington and the liberals who founded the American Republic exists, it will always have a Satanic root prone to arrogance, corruption, and bloodshed. 

Therefore, perhaps the best way to change this system is for an entirely new constitution which is based on divine values, not secular liberal values, to be drafted and ratified by independent-minded believers, both Christian and Muslim, who oppose the Satanic deep state. It can keep some of the good parts of the constitution, like the balances between the three branches of government or the various rights protected in the Bill of Rights, but God must be added to the picture even in those positive points.

This is perhaps one of the most difficult goals, due to the fact that it would challenge the money mafia and other powerful interest groups in the US who do not want to give up on their global scam. However, no matter how much of a pipe dream it is, with a new constitution and the elimination of an entrenched deep state, the Satanic empire could possibly be considered no more.

Russia presents a good example of a Christian nation which has a diverse population but exhibits tolerance and respect to the minority Muslim population, such as in Chechnya. Since the 2020 constitutional amendment referendum, its constitution mentions God and preserves moral values.

However, the US cannot do such a thing until it abandons and transforms itself away from its godless liberal foundation towards a nation based around divine values. The only way to do that is to fully dismantle the current structure of the US government, prosecute the deep state establishment for crimes against humanity, and establish a new constitution based on divine values. The entire definition of what it means to be American, which currently has no other meaning than being a godless transient consumer who believes their “exceptionalism” gives them the right to rule the world through bloodshed and exploitation, must change and reflect divine values instead of Satanic values.

However, for this to happen, the American people need to wake up on a large scale and realize the root of the problem, which is being in a state of rebellion against God, from the highest echelons of politics down to the personal lives of average people, although the social engineering of the Satanic system brainwashes the average person to become corrupted in their personal life, and creates entire social structures and systems  that encourage and facilitate personal corruption. When Americans finally follow the advice of Shaheed Malcolm X to study Islam, perhaps a critical mass of people will repent and desire a new form of government that isn’t totally wicked and Satanic in nature. Can voting truly change a corrupted system when the masses refuse to repent and turn to God and repudiate the devil, whom these corrupted politicians ultimately serve?

Therefore, voting in a system that is Satanic and rotten to the core, both in its worldview and its criminal actions worldwide, legitimizes the system. Only after the point when the US pays for all its crimes and corruption, dismantles its insidious deep state, changes its worldview from liberal to divine, creates a new constitution to reflect divine values instead of liberal values, stops controlling the earth through military occupation and NGO soft war degradation, and is practically an entire different entity and system than the original foundation created by slave-owning Masonic liberals like George Washington, would voting be a civic duty worth participating in. Until that day, we should not value such a wicked government by validating its existence with our votes.